Targeting Conscience

February 5th, 2009

I opened up my Arlington Catholic Herald today, since it always comes in the mail on Thursday, to see what’s going on in the Diocese, and I see this headline on page 2: Pro-life pharmacy targeted by proposed law.

Now, it states that the bill was introduced into the Virginia House of Delegates as a “general bill” (Virginia House Bill 2373) by delegate David Englin from Virginia’s 45th district requiring “pro-life” pharmacies to put a sign in the window proclaiming that they don’t sell contraceptives or abortifacients. But a quick search will reveal that DMC Pharmacy is the only one in Virginia. That means they were specifically targeted as an individual business — which is illegal (I think) or ought to be.

Nation-wide there are only 7 publicly confirmed “pro-life” pharmacies, but the radical foaming-at-the-mouth types would have you believe it’s an epidemic where you won’t be able to get an aspirin if your doctor doesn’t believe in it.

Other than the obvious religious bigotry, I have a personal reason for being incensed: I shop there. I know the pharmacist, Robert and Pam Semler, personally. (Nicer people you will not meet.) My family and friends go there precisely because they are pro-life. As Robert Semler said,

“We’re not threatening anybody. We’re just trying to serve a niche market of like-minded individuals.”

And believe me, this is a tiny store; there are several other national pharmacies within two hundred yards of this one, including a KMart and a CVS. I don’t sue Giant if they don’t carry Pistachio ice cream (they don’t, I looked); I don’t draft legislation against Target because they have one check out line without candy in it — some parents prefer that line. It’s the same thing here: people will patronize businesses that have (or explicitly lack) things they want. Others go somewhere else. It’s that simple.

Unfortunately, this is a small dose of a growing threat to personal conscience and values. Opponents worry they won’t be able to kill the right people if doctors and health care providers are allowed to exercise their own freedom of religion (aka conscience).

The price of freedom: eternal vigilance.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Angry enough to cross post from: Wynken, Blynken, and Nod

Related Posts with Thumbnails

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to Targeting Conscience

  1. Nod says:

    I can't get ham at a Halal store, either, but I wouldn't EXPECT to. Just go somewhere else!

  2. Rich says:

    It is all about "shutting down" the pro-life side of the debate. Don't argue with those with whom you disagree, just shut them down. Just another example of liberal "tolerance."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>